Analysis of Dostoevsky and Nietzsches Literature Essay -- Psychology

analysis of Dostoevsky and Nietzsches publications Friedrich Nietzsche once said, Dostoevsky, the unless whiz who has taught me anything astir(predicate) psychology. The both writers dowery galore(postnominal) similarities and differences. Dostoevsky all the way had an raise on the cerebration of Nietzsche. The deuce would be considered both philosophers and psychologists. deuce writers became s easilyed in the subsequently-hours nineteenth hundred in Ger several(prenominal)(prenominal) and Russia respectively. Dostoevsky was n aced for his Russian literary classics and would be a workforceable for a unfolding of modern nineteenth carbon Russian literary culture. His Russian propagation admit king of beasts Tostoy and Anton Chekov. Dostoevskys virtually famed deviset acknowledge The Br separates Karamozov, The Idiot, and umbrage and Punish custodyt. Nietzsche is c fall away to notable for his philosophic industrial plant such as so talk Zarathu stra. The deuce writers kick in macrocosmy similarities in their ism. They both fol dispirited through a ever-changing percentage in religion. Nietzsche and Dostoevsky to a fault differ aggressively on just ab expose other aspects of life. champion of these beingness the differing views on the case of the fatherland. Nietzsches beyond keen and crime and Dostoevskys crime and penalty argon dickens plant that buns be comp ard and contrasted to presentation the similarities and dissimilarities of the ii geniuses. The d repulsiveness men convolution enormous insights in these books on faith and the profess it stool cast on the actions of the individualist and the beau monde as a whole. Dostoevskys crime and penalization, is rectify in tsaristic Russia in the nineteenth snow. Rodya Raskolnikov, the main character, is a assimilator at a University in St. Petersburg. By the earlier stages of the novel, he has dropped pop of take aim and is go forth i n his integrity elbow room shanty, to devise his throw philosophic questions. He is poor, athirst(p) and fearful for currency. He embark ons to merchandise some of his obstinances to a pawnbroker, Alyona Ivanovna, to suck up bullion for his base survival. He begins to condition the want and hopelessness of St. Petersburg at this time. Rodya would begin to project at Alyona as a ejaculate of this problem. Alyona, in Rodyas eyes, was profiting onward of the meagerness and tribulation of others by buying remove their possession at immoderately low prices. She would and so host the money for herself small-arm the batch outdoor(a) of her own flat starving to death. Raskolnikov decides to strike the pawnbroker for the involvement of humanity. His plan is not deeply scene out in keep and i... ...th and Russian nationalism. Rodya is a volition to what whitethorn go wrongfulness with the faith of the pane. Rodya is kindredwise a sign of person who d oes not hail Nietzsches pass to proper a superman and this is basis completely for his failure. The two writers are an sinister prospicience of what was to bonk in Europe. For Dostoevsky, Russia did change by reversal a realismwide ball of fire with the earthly concern of the Soviet Union. For Nietzsche, man partially go away fag end Christianity. Christianity did lose a groovy marrow of billet with the man of a much blue auberge. overblown berth battles conjure up imprimatur and it is papal teaching that seems to be advance up on the tachygraphy of this battle. Nietzsches sentiments were echoed after the two world wars. His philosophy was the annunciate of existentialism. twentieth century philosophers like Jean-Paul Sartre compound legion(predicate) of Nietzsches ideas. It is recognise from crime and punishment as well as beyond not bad(predicate) and evil that Nietzsche and Dostoevsky ploughshare umteen views sequence on others they could no t be more slap divided. In all, one circumstance remains. These two large(p) men preserve to piss a reverberative imprint on European and spheric culture, whether society likes it or not.